Here is the ladder formula:

The problem with this, is that if you have negative points, then the higher percentage of rounds you win, the worse you'll do. So maybe make it like this if you have negative points.

( ave_cordumps - ave_coredumped - ave_teamkilled - ave_suicides )
x (1-(%age rounds_won/100))

this would make it better to have a higher win percentage if you have negatived points.

For 100th place at the time of writing:


(.67-.53-.06-.12) x (1-(54.31/100))
-.04*.4569
-.018276

If they had 0% rounds won, their final score would be -.04

Wouldn't be easier:

avecoredumps-avecoredumped-aveteamkilled-avesuicides+%roundswon/100+matchesplayed/1000

P.E:

Infamous: 1.08-.35-.02-.03+.72+.01=1,411
lag=0.95-.34-.01-.06+.62+.0.027=1,187

But Jin instead of 12 position:
Jin: 0.99-.5-.03-.07+.61+.142=1,142 in 3rd position because he didnt only play 10 matches for being in the top.
Achmed instead of 8 pos in 2cond, because que played more matches too:
0.85-.33-.03-.07+.68+.107=1,207

Im saying this because more people use to play few matches for being in top. At this way you can improve position of habitual players.